This article argues that professional military education (PME) is a critical yet underused tool for advancing NATO’s Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda.
This paper explores the existing provision for military education in UK universities and compares it against the stated priorities of the 2025 Strategic Defence Review.
Simon Chelton and Philip Shetler-Jones analyse the factors that limit its application to partners with a certain profile and discover that the advantages it offers over alternative acquisition pathways will not be open to all.
Keith Dear and Magdalena Pacholska argue that humans are responsible and accountable when delegating the use of lethal force to machines and these actions are regulated by existing international humanitarian law.
This paper argues that the true determinant of 21st-century spacepower is not expansion or weaponisation, but the ability to sustain presence against entropy.
One can argue there are broadly three types of university when it comes to defence and security: those not involved; those selectively engaged based on specific expertise; and those with defence integrated as a core priority.
Digital professional military education (PME) promises flexibility, rich engagement and new efficiencies in a world of permanently pressured workloads.
The 2025 Strategic Defence Review (SDR) is right, engaging future generations with defence is critical for resilience and prosperity, and to fight and win wars against wilful adversaries such as Russia.
The authors offer eight policy recommendations, and propose a roadmap for fostering oil trilateralism, greater South–South cooperation and sustainable development in the South Atlantic region.